Seat belt webbing and airbag fabric are two of the fastest-growing categories in India's automotive textiles, and both remain significantly import-dependent even as global safety-systems majors localise assembly here. Tyre cord fabric tells almost the opposite story: India is the world's second-largest nylon-6 tyre-cord-fabric producer, protected by anti-dumping duties against Chinese imports since 2019. This piece separates the two stories, and traces the one raw-material dependency — imported nylon-6 polymer — that sits underneath both.
Airbags and Seat Belts Are Import-Heavy. Tyre Cord Isn't. India's Automotive Textiles Aren't One Story
"Automotive textiles" is a category, not one story. The umbrella term (mobiltech, in the government's own terminology) covers interior trims, carpets, filters, battery separators, hood liners, belt reinforcement, seat belts, airbags and tyre-reinforcement fabric. Some of these India makes at world-leading scale. Others it still imports heavily. Treating the category as uniformly import-dependent, or uniformly self-sufficient, gets the real picture wrong either way.
Mobiltech — the Ministry of Textiles' own segment label for automotive, rail, aviation and marine technical textiles — was valued at roughly ₹13,595 crore in 2021 and is projected to reach ₹20,165 crore by FY2025-26, a 10.35% CAGR. That growth tracks the automotive sector directly: passenger and commercial vehicle sales crossed 40 lakh units in FY2023-24, and every one of those vehicles carries seat belts, at least one airbag, tyre-reinforcement fabric, carpeting and cabin filtration — all mobiltech products. Mobiltech isn't a minor corner of technical textiles either: Wazir Advisors' own analysis put it at 22% of India's total technical-textiles market as far back as 2018, already the single largest application segment then.
A separate market-research estimate (Markets&Data/UnivDatos) puts the India mobiltech market at USD 2.32 billion in FY2025, growing to USD 4.57 billion by FY2033 at an 8.84% CAGR — a lower growth rate than the ₹13,595cr→₹20,165cr NTTM-linked figures above (10.35%) on a different currency and timeframe basis. Both are vendor/programme estimates rather than audited figures; treat the growth-rate range (roughly 9-10% CAGR across sources) as the more reliable signal than either single number.
Seat belt webbing is 100% polyester, tightly woven for UV, rot and shrink resistance; airbag fabric is woven even more tightly, engineered for high tensile strength and low gas permeability so the cushion holds pressure for the fraction of a second it needs to. India is, by industry accounts, the fastest-growing seat belt webbing market globally, growing around 9.2% a year. That growth has pulled in the world's major restraint-systems makers: Autoliv (roughly 45% global market share), Joyson Safety Systems and ZF all either supply into India or have localised assembly here — Joyson's India joint venture with the ANAND Group, Joyson ANAND Abhishek Safety Systems, runs plants in Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan making seat belts, airbags and steering systems. On the fabric side specifically, Japan's Toray Industries has run a dedicated airbag-fabric plant at Sarigam in Gujarat since 2017, through a joint venture with local textile firm Kusumgar Corporates (Toray Kusumgar Advanced Textile Pvt Ltd, ₹140 crore paid-up capital) — one of the few India-based facilities actually weaving airbag-grade fabric domestically, rather than importing it for assembly elsewhere in the chain.
Localised assembly is not the same as localised material. The highest-performance fabric layers — the specific weave grades used in airbag cushions and load-limiting seat belt webbing — remain a significant import exposure even where final assembly happens in India, which is the general pattern across mobiltech: domestic consumption has been outpacing domestic production, and India is projected to stay a net importer of mobiltech goods for the next several years.
| Metric | Figure, ₹ crore | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Mobiltech market size | 13,595 | 2021 |
| Mobiltech market size (projected) | 20,165 | FY2025-26, 10.35% CAGR |
| Mobiltech imports | 6,004 | ~25.96% of all technical-textile imports |
| Automotive-textile exports | 2,704 | FY2025-26, ~10.3% of all technical-textile exports |
| Seat belt webbing market growth | ~9.2% p.a. | industry estimate |
The ₹6,004 crore import figure and the 2021 market-size figure are from the same NTTM-era baseline; the FY2025-26 projection and the ₹2,704 crore export figure are separate, later estimates, and years don't line up precisely across all four numbers — so the table should not be read as "X% of the FY2025-26 market is imported." What the mismatched-year figures still support directly: mobiltech imports run more than double automotive-textile exports (₹6,004cr against ₹2,704cr), a real net deficit on the trade-chapter figures alone, even before accounting for the classification gap described in Section 5. Mobiltech is a meaningfully larger share of India's technical-textile imports (~26%) than automotive textiles are of its technical-textile exports (~10%) — the segment imports more than its share of exports would suggest it should.
Set against seat belts and airbags, tyre cord fabric — the woven nylon or polyester reinforcement layer inside every tyre carcass — runs the opposite direction. SRF is the world's second-largest manufacturer of nylon-6 tyre cord fabric, and India's own tyre-cord-fabric market runs to roughly 180,000 tonnes a year across nylon-6, nylon-66 and polyester grades, produced domestically by SRF and Kordsa's Indian joint venture (Indo Kordsa) among others. This isn't a segment India is trying to build from nothing; it's one where domestic capacity already leads globally.
And it's actively protected. India has run anti-dumping duties against Chinese nylon tyre cord fabric since 2019, with a sunset review examining whether removing the duty would let Chinese dumping resume; a related anti-dumping duty on nylon tyre yarn from China was abolished and then, months later, the domestic-industry side pushed to reinstate it at USD 520-1,100 per tonne for five more years, arguing continued injury. Whichever way that specific tussle resolves, the pattern is consistent: tyre cord fabric is a segment India's trade-remedy apparatus actively works to keep protected, not one it's trying to substitute into from an import-dependent starting position.
Tyre cord fabric's domestic strength sits on top of an upstream dependency that doesn't show up if you only look at the finished fabric. Nylon-6 polymer — the chip and granule feedstock spun into nylon-6 yarn, which is then woven into nylon tyre cord fabric — is itself the subject of a live anti-dumping investigation: in December 2024, India's Directorate General of Trade Remedies opened a probe into nylon-6 chip and granule imports from China and Russia, covering the period July 2024 to June 2025, alongside a separate investigation into nylon filament yarn from China and Vietnam opened the same month.
That's the structural point worth taking from Sections 3 and 4 together: "India makes tyre cord fabric" and "India depends on imported nylon-6" are both true at the same time, at different points in the same supply chain. Import dependency in mobiltech isn't a single number to fix — it moves up and down the chain depending on which processing step you're looking at.
Finished seat belt assemblies and airbags are classified under HSN Chapter 87 (vehicle parts) — seat belt assemblies typically under 8708.21, airbags under 8708.95 — not under a textile HSN chapter, even though the core material in both is a woven technical fabric. That means official "technical textile import" statistics, which are compiled from textile-chapter trade data, likely miss the textile content embedded inside finished safety systems imported as auto parts. The mobiltech import figures in Section 2 capture textile-chapter imports (fabric, webbing rolls, and similar intermediate goods); they do not capture the textile value inside a fully assembled imported seat belt or airbag module, which shows up instead in India's much larger and more frequently discussed vehicle-parts import bill. The real scale of India's automotive-textile import dependency is very likely understated by the numbers this piece was able to source, for exactly this classification reason.
Three overlapping government programmes touch this space, none of them automotive-specific:
| Programme | Outlay | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| National Technical Textiles Mission (2020-2026) | ₹1,480 crore since launch | 168+ R&D projects funded (₹500cr+), market development, export promotion, skilling — all 12 technical-textile segments, mobiltech included but not singled out |
| PLI Scheme for Textiles | ₹10,683 crore | MMF apparel, MMF fabrics and technical textile products; recent amendments lowered investment thresholds and widened eligible products |
| PM MITRA integrated textile parks | ₹4,445 crore | 7 sites (Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra) — general textile-park infrastructure, not mobiltech-specific |
None of these three programmes carve out seat belts, airbags or tyre cord fabric by name. The localisation actually happening in the most import-exposed segment — restraint systems — is being driven by the global safety-systems majors' own India joint ventures (Joyson-ANAND being the clearest example), pulled in by rising vehicle production, not by a targeted government scheme aimed specifically at this category. This site's own deep-dive on PM MITRA's site selection and feedstock logic covers the ₹4,445cr/seven-site programme in more depth, including why park siting relative to petrochemical capacity (not just land availability) determines whether "domestic" feedstock actually stays cost-competitive once freight is added back — and gives Mobiltech's own FY2025-26 trade figures with more precision than this piece's: exports $283M, imports $592M, a $309M net deficit that widened as exports fell 21.4% year-on-year, computed from official DGCI&S TradeStat data against that piece's own 314-code segment mapping (a same-methodology proxy, not an official Ministry figure — the Ministry's own published basket uses 207 codes).
What this piece does not establish. The Ministry of Textiles' own technical-textiles opportunities/challenges report (texmin.gov.in) returned an access error (HTTP 403) to this piece's research tools, so the NTTM and mobiltech figures here rely on secondary reporting rather than that primary document. The exact percentage of FY2025-26 mobiltech demand met by imports is not available — Section 2's figures span different base years and should be read directionally, not as a precise current import-penetration rate. Plant-level Indian manufacturing capacity specifically for airbag-grade fabric, separate from seat belt webbing capacity, was not found. And per Section 5, the true scale of automotive-textile imports embedded inside finished, HSN-87-classified safety systems is likely larger than the textile-chapter import figures cited here capture — this piece flags that gap rather than estimating a number for it.
About this article: Researched, written and edited by Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan, with AI research assistance; every figure is meant to trace to the primary source cited. See the Editorial Policy for how sourcing, AI use and corrections work.