Thinking global, living local

Where India's Captured Carbon Would Actually Go: Two Named Wells, and a Lot of Basins on a Map

August 28, 2026

India has just committed ₹20,000 crore to a CCUS Mission, but capturing carbon dioxide is only half the problem — it has to go somewhere afterward. The subsurface data that answers "where" comes overwhelmingly from decades of oil and gas exploration held by the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons' National Data Repository, and only two named wells anywhere in the country are actually running a CO₂ injection pilot right now. This piece maps what's actually been named as a storage site, what's still just a basin on a map, and the wide, unresolved gap between different capacity estimates for the same rock.

Climate & Carbon · Energy & Fuels · India · 28 August 2026

Where India's Captured Carbon Would Actually Go: Two Named Wells, and a Lot of Basins on a Map

Skip to article content
Text Size

Why this is a well-data question, not just a policy question

A ₹20,000 crore CCUS Mission (covered in detail in this blog's separate piece on India's Net Zero scenarios) answers the question of who pays to capture carbon dioxide from power plants, cement kilns, steel mills, refineries and chemical plants. It does not by itself answer a separate, physically unavoidable question: once captured, where does the CO₂ actually go? The honest answer is that nobody is starting from scratch on this — India has been drilling, logging, and seismically surveying its sedimentary basins for oil and gas since before independence, and that decades-deep well and seismic record, held centrally in the National Data Repository (NDR) run by the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH, under the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas), is the foundational dataset every subsequent CO₂-storage assessment in India draws on, whether the assessment is done by ONGC, Oil India, an IIT, or an academic research group. This piece did not find a DGH-authored report specifically titled or framed as a CCUS storage assessment; DGH's actual role is narrower and still essential — it is the data custodian other bodies build their own storage assessments on top of.

An ONGC offshore oil and gas processing platform at Bombay High
ONGC's decades of oil and gas exploration, run from platforms like this one at Bombay High, are the source of the subsurface data this piece says India's CCUS site selection depends on. ONGC Oil Platform.jpg, Nandu Chitnis, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The named basins — and the difference between naming a basin and identifying a well

NITI Aayog's own January 2025 workshop on CCUS in the cement sector named the country's principal storage opportunities directly: "India has immense potential for CCUS, with regions like the Krishna-Godavari Basin, Deccan Traps, and mature oil and gas fields offering substantial CO₂ storage capacity." Separate reporting on the same theme adds the Cambay Basin, the Cauvery Basin, Mumbai Offshore, and the Assam-Arakan Fold Belt to that list — the same handful of hydrocarbon-bearing sedimentary basins that show up in DGH's own shale-gas and coalbed-methane resource assessments, because they are the basins India has decades of well and seismic data for in the first place.

India’s Named CO₂ Storage Corridors Basins NITI Aayog itself has named as CCUS storage opportunities, plus where the two live pilots actually sit Cambay Basin (Gujarat) ONGC Gandhar pilot: 2 abandoned wells, ~100 t/day CO₂ Assam-Arakan Fold Belt OIL India: 5 depleted fields shortlisted, Barail/Tipam fms. Krishna-Godavari Basin Named by NITI Aayog; no pilot well identified in sources reviewed Cauvery Basin Named by NITI Aayog; no pilot well identified in sources reviewed Mumbai Offshore Named by NITI Aayog; no pilot well identified in sources reviewed Deccan Traps (basalt) Named by NITI Aayog as a formation type, not a single basin Has a named, well-level pilot project as of this writing Named as a storage opportunity, no specific well/pilot found Source: NITI Aayog CCUS-in-cement workshop (PIB, 17 Jan 2025) for the basin list; ONGC and OIL India statements for pilot-well detail.
Naming a basin as having "substantial CO₂ storage capacity" and identifying an actual injectable well are two different levels of specificity — this piece found only two basins with the latter.

That distinction matters. A basin being named as a storage opportunity in a workshop presentation is a geological screening judgement; it is not the same as identifying a specific depleted reservoir, characterising its caprock integrity, and confirming injectivity through an actual well test. As of this piece's research, only two of the named basins — Cambay and the Assam-Arakan Fold Belt — have a named, well-level pilot project actually under way. The rest remain named opportunities on a map, not yet identified wells.

The two real pilots

ONGC's first full-scale CCS pilot, announced in early January 2026, will inject captured CO₂ into two abandoned onshore wells at its Gandhar field, Gujarat — part of the Cambay Basin, one of India's oldest and most thoroughly drilled hydrocarbon provinces. The plan is to inject roughly 100 tonnes of CO₂ a day, sourced from nearby industrial emitters in the Dahej cluster as well as ONGC's own Hazira plant, into subsurface hydrocarbon reservoirs — with a secondary objective of testing CO₂-enhanced oil recovery (CO₂-EOR) at the same wells, turning the injected gas into a production tool rather than pure disposal. ONGC has said it will engage a specialised CCUS consultant for feasibility work and regulatory guidance, which suggests the well-selection and injectivity case is still being finalised in detail even as the pilot is publicly announced. This builds on a December 2022 memorandum of understanding between ONGC and Shell specifically to conduct joint CO₂ storage and EOR-assessment studies across basins with depleted oil and gas fields and saline aquifers — meaning the Gandhar pilot is the concrete output of a three-year-old study partnership, not a standing start.

Oil India Limited's parallel effort sits in the Assam-Arakan Fold Belt, targeting the Barail and Tipam geological formations. OIL's Chairman and Managing Director, Dr Ranjit Rath, said in February 2024: "We are looking at our depleted fields, abandoned wells and exploring using these fields for storing either carbon or gas. We have shortlisted five. Studies are underway to see how CO₂ behaves when injected into these rock formations." Unlike ONGC's Gandhar announcement, this piece did not find a subsequent, more specific update naming which five fields were shortlisted, what stage the injectivity studies have reached as of 2026, or a target injection volume — the February 2024 statement remains the most specific public account this piece could locate.

The capacity numbers don't agree with each other, and that's worth saying plainly

Published capacity estimates for the same rock vary by roughly two orders of magnitude, depending entirely on what is being measured. A hydrocarbon-reservoir-specific estimate for the Cambay Basin — storage capacity in already-characterised oil and gas fields, calculated from ultimate recoverable reserves plus CO₂-EOR potential — puts the figure at more than 650 million tonnes. Separate academic literature estimating India's saline aquifer storage potential nationally — a much larger, less characterised rock volume that includes but is not limited to Cambay — puts the range at 50 to 270 billion tonnes, and a combined multi-basin onshore estimate cited in industry literature lands at a mid-case of 74.8 billion tonnes. These are not competing answers to the same question; they are answers to three different questions (one basin's proven hydrocarbon reservoirs; the nation's saline aquifers broadly; a multi-basin onshore composite), and this piece deliberately does not average or reconcile them into one headline number, because doing so would imply a precision the underlying data doesn't support.

The gap between "650 million tonnes in one basin's characterised oil and gas fields" and "50 to 270 billion tonnes in the nation's saline aquifers" is not a rounding difference — it is the gap between what DGH's well data has already proven through decades of drilling, and what remains geological inference about rock nobody has actually drilled into for this specific purpose yet.

A separate, non-well storage track: coal seams, not oil fields

Not every Indian CO₂-storage initiative runs through DGH's oil-and-gas well data at all. In November 2022, NTPC's own R&D arm (NETRA), NITI Aayog, and the National Centre of Excellence in Carbon Capture & Utilisation (NCoE-CCU) at IIT Bombay launched a separate assessment of CO₂ storage potential specifically in coalbed methane (CBM)-rich coalfields, including fields NTPC itself holds, aiming to produce a "CO₂ Storage Atlas" for selected Indian coalfields within twelve months of the November 2022 launch. This piece could not find a published version of that Atlas or a status update on its completion, roughly three-and-a-half years after the stated timeline — an absence this piece treats as informative rather than as confirmation the work stalled, consistent with how it has treated similar silences elsewhere. Coal seams are a geologically distinct storage medium from depleted oil and gas reservoirs or saline aquifers (CO₂ adsorbs onto coal rather than filling pore space), and NTPC's initiative sits organisationally and geologically apart from the DGH-well-data-driven ONGC and OIL India work described above.

What this piece does not establish. This piece does not establish that DGH has authored or published its own dedicated CCUS storage-potential report; its role, on the evidence found, is as custodian of the National Data Repository's well and seismic data that other bodies (ONGC, OIL India, IIT Bombay's NCoE-CCU, and independent academic researchers) build their own storage assessments from. It does not establish a single reconciled figure for India's total CO₂ storage capacity; the 650 million tonne (Cambay hydrocarbon fields), 50-270 billion tonne (national saline aquifers), and 74.8 billion tonne (multi-basin onshore composite) figures answer different questions at different scopes and are not directly comparable, as explained above. It does not establish OIL India's current 2026 status on its five shortlisted Assam fields beyond the CMD's February 2024 statement, or whether NTPC/NITI Aayog/NCoE-CCU's coalfield CO₂ Storage Atlas was ever completed and published. It does not establish injectivity, caprock integrity, or monitoring plans for either the Gandhar or Assam pilots beyond what ONGC and OIL India have themselves stated publicly. This piece does not recommend any investment, business, or policy decision; nothing here is investment, safety, or geological advice.

Sources and caveats

DGH's role and the National Data Repository's basin coverage (Cambay, Krishna-Godavari, Cauvery, Assam-Arakan, and related basins, as used for shale-gas and coalbed-methane resource assessment) are drawn from DGH's own National Data Repository website (ndrdgh.gov.in), a primary source — graded strong for DGH's documented basin-data role, though this piece did not locate a DGH page specifically framed around CO₂ storage rather than shale gas/CBM. The named CCUS storage basins (Krishna-Godavari, Deccan Traps, Cambay, Cauvery, Mumbai Offshore, Assam-Arakan Fold Belt, and "mature oil and gas fields" generally) are drawn from PIB's "NITI Aayog Organizes Workshop on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in the Indian Cement Sector" (Release ID 2093760, 17 January 2025), read directly — graded strong; the same release is the source for Ministry of Power Secretary Pankaj Agarwal's confirmation that his ministry is preparing the national CCUS Mission, and for cement-sector figures (600 million tonnes installed capacity, 391 million tonnes 2022-23 production, 5.8% of India's CO₂ emissions, 35-45% of sector emissions requiring CCUS as an abatement lever). ONGC's Gandhar CCS pilot (two abandoned onshore wells; ~100 tonnes/day CO₂ injection target; Dahej-cluster and Hazira-plant CO₂ sourcing; CO₂-EOR secondary objective; specialised-consultant engagement; announced early January 2026) is drawn from Outlook Business, Business Standard, and Millennium Post reporting on the same announcement, cross-consistent across independent outlets — graded strong; the December 2022 ONGC-Shell MoU for joint CO₂ storage/EOR studies is drawn from the same reporting lineage and PSU Watch's February 2024 coverage, graded strong. OIL India's Assam-Arakan pilot (Barail/Tipam formations, five shortlisted depleted fields/abandoned wells, CMD Dr Ranjit Rath's directly quoted February 2024 statement) is drawn from PSU Watch's own reporting of Rath's remarks at an industry event — graded strong as a directly quoted primary statement, though this piece could not find a more recent (2025-2026) update on this specific initiative's progress, a gap explicitly flagged above. The capacity estimates (650+ million tonnes for Cambay's hydrocarbon-field-specific storage; 50-270 billion tonnes for India's national saline-aquifer potential; a 74.8 billion tonne multi-basin onshore mid-estimate) are drawn from academic and industry literature (ScienceDirect-indexed research on Cambay Basin CO₂ storage, and secondary aggregation of further academic saline-aquifer estimates) — graded moderate, since these are research literature rather than a single authoritative government figure, and their differing scopes are explicitly not reconciled into one number in this piece. A specific "16.4 gigatonne" Cambay-only figure that appeared in one search summary during this piece's research could not be independently verified against a readable source and is deliberately not used. NTPC/NETRA, NITI Aayog, and NCoE-CCU IIT Bombay's coalfield CO₂ Storage Atlas initiative (November 2022 launch, twelve-month stated timeline, CBM-rich coalfields including those held by NTPC) is drawn directly from PIB's own release (Release ID 1878184, 22 November 2022) — graded strong for the initiative's existence and design, though this piece found no published Atlas or completion update since, a gap explicitly flagged rather than assumed to mean the work stalled. This article does not recommend any investment, business, or policy decision; nothing here is investment, safety, or geological advice.

About this article: Researched, written and edited by Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan, with AI research assistance; every figure is meant to trace to the primary source cited. See the Editorial Policy for how sourcing, AI use and corrections work.

Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Contact Us
Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Investment Promotion & Energy-Sector Leader · Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
LinkedIn → GitHub → Email +91 78273 81696
How this site works

Data-led analysis of India's trade, currency and industrial policy. Every article is built from primary official sources, and every figure links back to the release, table or filing it came from.

Sources. DGCI&S TradeStat (imports/exports, HSN-wise) · PIB (government press releases, January 2017 to today, refreshed daily) · RBI (circulars, balance of payments) · MoSPI (CPI/WPI, IIP) · PARIVESH (environmental clearances) · CCIL (bond yields) · BIS (policy rates) · SEBI, NSE/BSE and SEC filings for company data.

Interpretation. Figures carry their vintage and retrieval date; estimates and press-reported numbers are labelled as such; where sources disagree, both are shown. Corrections are made visibly, never silently. Articles are written with AI assistance from the cited sources — AI-generated text can misstate figures even when working from real material, so verify any number that matters to a decision against the linked primary source.

footer

Browse all articles by topic

Every piece on this blog, grouped. Or read the full index.

Agriculture & FertilisersAI ToolsChemicalsClimate & CarbonEnergy & FuelsGas & LNGImport SubstitutionIndustrial PolicyMarkets & FinanceMobility & EVPrices & InflationTextilesTrade & Tariffs

Each topic is a live archive page that updates itself as pieces are labelled. It replaces a hand-kept list that had fallen 18 articles behind.