Thinking global, living local

India's Approved Solar-Cell Makers Can Now Make 37.8 GW a Year. Rooftop Projects Have Until 31 December to Use Them

October 26, 2026

MNRE’s approved list of domestic solar-cell makers now holds 37.8 GW a year of enlisted capacity across 19 company names, but a third of it is in one state and the window for rooftop and open-access projects to skip the list shuts on 31 December 2026.

Energy · Solar Manufacturing · ALMM List-II

India’s Approved Solar-Cell Makers Can Now Make 37.8 GW a Year. Rooftop Projects Have Until 31 December to Use Them

Skip to article content
Text Size

Revised · v1.0.0 · what changed

37.8 GWCell capacity enlisted a year in ALMM List-II, 12th revision, 8 Oct 2026
19 / 21Company names / manufacturing units on the list
2.9xGrowth since the first list of 31 Jul 2025 (13.1 GW)
6.0xModule capacity on List-I (228.5 GW, Sept 2026) over cell capacity on List-II

India’s approved list of solar-cell factories now totals 37,796 MW a year of enlisted capacity, from 19 company names running 21 units, according to my sum of the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy’s (MNRE) 12th revision of ALMM List-II, dated 8 October 2026. That is the number that decides how many rooftop and open-access solar projects can be built with Indian cells. Under MNRE’s office memorandum of 18 July 2026, those projects can still commission without List-II cells until 31 December 2026. After that the list applies to them in full.

A date to get right. The cell rule for net-metering and open-access projects dates from 1 June 2026, not 18 June. The 18 July memorandum is the document that moved the exemption from 31 May to 31 December. I read the scanned memorandum page directly to confirm this, because text extraction misreads “1st” as “18”.

What the rule says, and what the July memorandum changed

The framework dates from MNRE’s memorandum of 9 December 2024. Modules must come from ALMM List-I, and those modules must in turn use cells from List-II. For net-metering and open-access renewable projects, the memorandum of 18 July 2026 recites that the rule bites on projects commissioned on or after 1 June 2026. It then does three things:

  • It refuses a blanket extension of List-II for solar power projects.
  • It gives net-metering and open-access projects a limited window to commission without List-II cells until 31 December 2026. In its words, such projects commissioned after 31 December 2026 “will be required to comply” with List-II.
  • It supersedes MNRE’s memorandum of 25 May 2026 and four June memoranda (8 June twice, 15 June and 23 June).

The earlier 25 May memorandum was stricter. It also refused a blanket extension, but offered relief only case by case. A developer had to show that every module was already installed on site (Category I), or that “effective steps” had been taken (Category II). The second category needed at least 75% of the land, financial closure, a connectivity grant, approved electrical drawings and modules on site. Claims had to be filed on a National Institute of Solar Energy portal by 30 June 2026. The 18 July text, as I read it, lists no such conditions for the window. The test is the commissioning date. I could not confirm how states and distribution companies are applying it.

The list: 37.8 GW, with a long tail

List-II is published as a stack of revisions. The base list of 31 July 2025 and each later revision add or change entries. A note on every revision says the capacity shown against a unit replaces its earlier figure and is not added to it. I applied that rule unit by unit, and the arithmetic is in the companion notes. Twelve company names account for 86% of the total.

Manufacturer (as listed)StateCell type (MW a year)Enlisted capacity (MW a year)Share of total (%)
Waaree EnergiesGujaratPERC 1,328 + TOPCon 4,0215,34914.2
TP SolarTamil NaduPERC 4,480 + TOPCon 534,53312.0
Avaada ElectroMaharashtraTOPCon3,6219.6
FS India Solar VenturesTamil NaduNot stated (deemed from List-I)3,4339.1
Premier Energies PhotovoltaicTelanganaPERC 1,280 + TOPCon 1,3582,6387.0
Mundra Solar PVGujaratTOPCon2,2986.1
Jupiter Solartech (two units)Himachal PradeshPERC 991 + TOPCon 1,2972,2886.1
Emmvee EnergyKarnatakaTOPCon2,1535.7
Mundra Solar EnergyGujaratPERC1,9395.1
ReNew PhotovoltaicsGujaratPERC1,7664.7
Reliance IndustriesGujaratHJT1,2383.3
Websol Energy SystemWest BengalPERC1,2023.2
Seven others (below 1.2 GW each)Six statesMixed5,33814.1
Total37,796100.0

Two points about the table. First, Waaree and TP Solar together hold 26% of the list, and the five largest names hold 52%. Second, FS India Solar Ventures is on the list without a cell type or efficiency range. The list says it is “deemed to be eligible” because it is already enlisted on List-I, under paragraph 9 of the December 2024 memorandum, so I report it as type not stated.

Where the factories are

StateEnlisted capacity (MW a year)Share of total (%)Who is there
Gujarat12,99234.4Mundra (two entities), ReNew, Waaree, Reliance, Gopin
Tamil Nadu7,96621.1TP Solar, FS India
Telangana4,36411.5Premier (two entities), Renewsys
Maharashtra3,6219.6Avaada
Himachal Pradesh3,0678.1Jupiter (two companies, four units)
Karnataka2,4336.4Emmvee, Tata Power Renewable
West Bengal1,2023.2Websol
Uttar Pradesh1,0772.8Fujiyama
Andhra Pradesh1,0742.8Evervolt

Gujarat holds 34% and Tamil Nadu 21%. Nine states appear. By technology, mono PERC is still 46% of the list and TOPCon 42%:

Cell technologyEnlisted capacity (MW a year)Share of total (%)
Mono PERC (P-type)17,37046.0
TOPCon (N-type)15,75541.7
Type not stated (FS India, deemed from List-I)3,4339.1
HJT1,2383.3

TOPCon accounts for 15.8 GW of the total, and the latest additions are TOPCon: Jupiter Solartech’s 1,297 MW (28 September) and Gopin Semicon’s 402 MW (8 October). The one HJT line is Reliance’s 1,238 MW at Jamnagar, listed on 13 April 2026.

How fast the list has grown

RevisionDateCumulative enlisted capacity (MW a year)Company namesCell lines on list
0 (base)31 Jul 202513,06789
123 Sep 202517,8801012
224 Nov 202518,4821113
315 Dec 202523,7331215
45 Feb 202626,7911317
513 Feb 202627,2281418
613 Apr 202630,0571620
730 Apr 202630,5091721
822 Jul 202631,7591822
921 Aug 202635,4681822
1028 Sep 202636,8651823
115 Oct 202637,3941823
128 Oct 202637,7961924

The list has roughly tripled in fourteen months, from 13,067 MW to 37,796 MW. The biggest single jump was the third revision (15 December 2025), when Waaree’s 5,251 MW went on. My running total for the ninth revision, 35,468 MW, is within 1 MW of the 35,467 MW that trade outlet Energetica India reports for that revision. That is a useful independent check on the method.

Cells are the narrow end of the pipe

Modules are far easier to build than cells. Energetica India, which tracks MNRE’s List-I, reports cumulative enlisted module capacity of 228,524 MW after the September 2026 update. That is six times the cell capacity: 228,524 divided by 37,796 is 6.0. A module line needs cells, so List-II is where the constraint would show first.

Compare the cell capacity with what India installs. JMK Research, citing MNRE, puts solar additions in FY2026 at about 44.6 GW, of which about 34.8 GW ground-mounted and 8.7 GW rooftop. Enlisted cell capacity of 37.8 GW is about 85% of the all-segment total and 4.3 times the rooftop figure.

Do not read this as supply versus demand. The comparison is indicative only. Enlisted capacity is a factory’s annual nameplate, not what it ships, and a plant listed this month may not be at full output. The installation figures may mix AC and DC reporting bases, which I could not check. And List-II binds only some projects. Utility-scale projects won on bids submitted before 31 August 2025 are exempt, so part of the 34.8 GW of ground-mounted additions never needed List-II cells. The segment that does need them from January is net-metering and open access, and I have no published count of that demand.

What to watch before 31 December

  • Whether the window moves again. MNRE issued five memoranda on the deadline between 25 May and 18 July, and the 18 July one itself records that the earlier dispensation ran only to 31 May 2026.
  • Which plants ramp. The list shows capacity MNRE has enlisted, not cells delivered. Avaada’s entry went from 610 MW to 3,621 MW in a single month (22 July to 21 August).
  • Geography. A developer in a state with no enlisted cell plant must buy from Gujarat, Tamil Nadu or Telangana, which together hold 67% of the list.
  • Efficiency claims. The list carries manufacturer-claimed efficiency and wattage ranges, not tested values.

This sits alongside two earlier posts on the same industry: India’s battery storage boom and the solar panel recycling opportunity. All three turn on the same question of how much of the solar chain is made at home.

What I could not check. I could not compute List-I’s own total from the ministry’s file. The 3 August 2026 List-I PDF is a stack of 50 revisions with no running total, so the module figure above comes from Energetica India’s tracking and is not independently summed. I also could not read the pv magazine report on FY2026 installations, because its site blocked my request, so I used JMK Research’s version of the same data. Whether the 25 May provision for residential “Give It Up” consumers under PM Surya Ghar survives the 18 July supersession is not stated in the text I read.

Sources: MNRE, ALMM List-II for solar PV cells, 12th revision with all earlier revisions (8 October 2026), PDF; MNRE O.M. No. 283/53/2026-GRID SOLAR, 18 July 2026, PDF; MNRE O.M. No. 283/63/2025-GRID SOLAR, 25 May 2026, PDF; MNRE O.M. No. 283/34/2026-GRID SOLAR, 6 July 2026, PDF; MNRE, ALMM List-I for solar PV modules, update of 3 August 2026, PDF; Energetica India, ALMM update, September 2026 (secondary, module total); JMK Research, India installs record 44 GW solar in FY2026, 10 April 2026 (secondary). The List-II totals are my own sum of unit capacities, not a figure MNRE publishes. Capacity is annual manufacturing capacity as enlisted, not production.

Revision history.
  • v1.0.0 — 26 October 2026 — first published.

About this article: Researched, written and edited by Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan, with AI research assistance; every figure is meant to trace to the primary source cited. See the Editorial Policy for how sourcing, AI use and corrections work.

Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Contact Us
Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Investment Promotion & Energy-Sector Leader · Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
LinkedIn → GitHub → Email +91 78273 81696
How this site works

Data-led analysis of India's trade, currency and industrial policy. Every article is built from primary official sources, and every figure links back to the release, table or filing it came from.

Sources. DGCI&S TradeStat (imports/exports, HSN-wise) · PIB (government press releases, January 2017 to today, refreshed daily) · RBI (circulars, balance of payments) · MoSPI (CPI/WPI, IIP) · PARIVESH (environmental clearances) · CCIL (bond yields) · BIS (policy rates) · SEBI, NSE/BSE and SEC filings for company data.

Interpretation. Figures carry their vintage and retrieval date; estimates and press-reported numbers are labelled as such; where sources disagree, both are shown. Corrections are made visibly, never silently. Articles are written with AI assistance from the cited sources — AI-generated text can misstate figures even when working from real material, so verify any number that matters to a decision against the linked primary source.

footer

Browse all articles by topic

Every piece on this blog, grouped. Or read the full index.

Agriculture & FertilisersAI ToolsChemicalsClimate & CarbonEnergy & FuelsGas & LNGImport SubstitutionIndustrial PolicyMarkets & FinanceMobility & EVPrices & InflationTextilesTrade & Tariffs

Each topic is a live archive page that updates itself as pieces are labelled. It replaces a hand-kept list that had fallen 18 articles behind.