Thinking global, living local

India's Trade Story Has Three Big Wins and One Gap the Headlines Skip

August 08, 2026

A record $825 billion in exports, a landmark EU trade deal, a PLI scheme that overshot its own investment target by 26%. Every headline number is real. The gap sits underneath them: in the first half of this fiscal year, merchandise exports grew 2.4% while services grew 6.5% — and almost every big new scheme this piece covers is aimed at the slower-growing half.

Trade · Policy · Exports

India's Trade Story Has Three Big Wins and One Gap the Headlines Skip

Where India's export growth is coming from Year-on-year growth, H1 FY26 2% 4% 6% 8% 2.4% Merchandise exports target of EPM, EU FTA & PLI scheme 6.5% Services exports no comparable dedicated scheme Source: Economic Survey 2025-26
H1 FY26: merchandise export growth lagged services by nearly 3x, even as three major policies target goods trade.
Skip to article content
Text Size

Published · v1.0.0 · Economic Survey 2025-26 · India-EU FTA, concluded 27 January 2026

Container handling at Jawaharlal Nehru Port
Container traffic through ports like JNPT is where the record merchandise-export numbers this piece cites physically move. JNPT Port container handling.jpg, Ccmarathe, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
$825.3bnIndia's record goods + services exports, FY25
2.4%Merchandise export growth, H1 FY26 — despite higher US tariffs
6.5%Services export growth, the same half-year
₹25,060crExport Promotion Mission outlay, FY26–FY31

The three wins

All real, all recent, all aimed substantially at goods trade.

The Export Promotion Mission, approved by Cabinet in November 2025 with a ₹25,060 crore outlay running FY2025-26 to FY2030-31, consolidates multiple export-support schemes into one digitally managed, outcome-linked framework run by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade. Its stated targets are MSMEs, first-time exporters, labour-intensive sectors and exporters based in non-traditional, low-export-intensity districts — and its trade-finance component, NIRYAT PROTSAHAN, offers interest subvention, export factoring, collateral guarantees and credit-enhancement support specifically to help smaller exporters diversify into new markets.

The India-EU Free Trade Agreement, concluded 27 January 2026, gives India preferential access across 97% of EU tariff lines, covering 99.5% of India's exports by value. Of that, 70.4% of tariff lines — 90.7% of India's export value — get immediate duty elimination, concentrated in exactly the labour-intensive sectors the Export Promotion Mission also targets: textiles, leather, footwear, tea, coffee, spices, sports goods, gems and jewellery, and marine products. A further 20.3% of tariff lines phase to zero duty over three to five years. In the other direction, India cuts car tariffs from 110% to as low as 10% over time, eliminates car-parts tariffs over five to ten years, and drops wine duties from 150% to 20–30% — while keeping dairy, cereals, poultry, soymeal and select fruits and vegetables protected.

Exhibit 1

The PLI scheme, four years into its FY2026 reporting

Cumulative figures across 14 sectors, as of 31 March 2026.

MetricValueUnit
Approved outlay1.91₹ lakh crore
Actual investment attracted2.40₹ lakh crore
Jobs generated (direct + indirect)14.15lakh
Cumulative exports enabled15.2₹ lakh crore
Same figure, at ₹85/US$ (31 March 2026)178.8US$ billion
Highest-investment sector: solar PV modules64,873₹ crore
Second: pharmaceutical drugs45,158₹ crore
Third: automobiles and auto components44,326₹ crore

Government of India figures as compiled in press coverage (Business Standard, A2Z Taxcorp, The Hawk), citing official PLI scheme reporting through 31 March 2026.

The PLI scheme has attracted 26% more investment than its own approved outlay — ₹2.40 lakh crore against ₹1.91 lakh crore — and generated cumulative exports of ₹15.2 lakh crore (US$178.8 billion at ₹85/US$, the approximate rate as of 31 March 2026) across its 14 sectors since inception. Every one of its three biggest sectors by investment — solar PV, pharmaceuticals, autos — is a goods-manufacturing category.

The gap: which half of exports is actually growing

Three headline wins for goods trade. The growth is in services.

India's exports hit a record US$825.3 billion in FY25 across goods and services combined, per the Economic Survey 2025-26. Services exports alone reached an all-time high of US$387.5 billion, up 13.6% year-on-year. Zoom into the most recent half-year and the split sharpens: in H1 FY26, combined goods-and-services exports grew 5.9% per the source figure (a weighted blend of the two segments below, not a simple average of the two percentages, and this piece has not independently re-derived it from the underlying dollar values) — but that headline number is doing a lot of work to smooth over a real divergence — merchandise exports grew just 2.4%, despite higher tariffs imposed by the United States, while services exports grew 6.5%. Over the longer run the same pattern holds at a structural level: India's share of global merchandise exports rose from 1% to 1.8% between 2005 and 2024, while its share of global services exports rose from 2% to 4.3% — the services share more than doubling, the goods share not quite doubling, from a smaller base gain in absolute percentage-point terms.

The mismatch this article is flagging. Every major policy instrument covered above — the Export Promotion Mission, the EU FTA's tariff concessions, the PLI scheme's ₹2.4 lakh crore in investment — is aimed overwhelmingly at merchandise trade: textiles, leather, marine products, solar panels, pharmaceuticals, automobiles. That is not a criticism of any single scheme; goods manufacturing carries employment-intensity and strategic-autonomy arguments services exports do not. But the growth data says services are currently the faster-compounding half of India's export economy, and the article's own dataset does not surface a services-specific policy instrument of comparable scale to set against the EPM, the FTA or the PLI scheme. Whether that is a genuine policy gap or simply a reflection of services already being globally competitive without needing the same subsidy architecture is a judgement this article does not make — it only surfaces that the asymmetry exists.
What this article does not establish. Whether a dedicated services-export promotion scheme exists at comparable scale to the three goods-focused instruments covered here — not found in this research, but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Whether the 2.4% merchandise growth figure reflects US-tariff drag specifically or broader global demand softness — the Economic Survey's own framing credits tariffs, but this article did not decompose the effect. And whether the EU FTA's services provisions (which exist alongside the goods tariff schedule detailed above) are comparably ambitious to its goods provisions — not examined in this piece, which focused on the tariff-line data available.

Sources. Export Promotion Mission outlay, structure and targets — PM India press release and IBEF/Drishti IAS/A2Z Taxcorp coverage of the November 2025 Cabinet approval; PIB's original release (PRID 2199733) could not be directly accessed (403 error). India-EU FTA terms — Ministry of Commerce & Industry release of 27 January 2026 (commerce.gov.in), as reported by KPMG, Lexology, Bajaj Finserv and the EU's own Intellectual Property Helpdesk news page; PIB's original release (PRID 2219065) could not be directly accessed. PLI scheme cumulative figures — Business Standard, A2Z Taxcorp and The Hawk, all citing official government reporting through 31 March 2026; PIB's original release (PRID 2230621) could not be directly accessed. Export growth and market-share figures — Economic Survey 2025-26, as summarised by IBEF, Insights on India and India Briefing; PIB's original Economic Survey highlights release (PRID 2219907) could not be directly accessed. Where this article relies on secondary reporting of a government release rather than the release itself, that is noted above.

Related on this blog: India's Trade, Currency & Policy Snapshot for FY2025-26 — Every Figure in One Unit · Nine Countries Account for Most of India's Merchandise Deficit — the fuller FY2025-26 snapshot this piece's three-wins framing is drawn from, and the country-level deficit data behind the one gap it flags.

About this article: Researched, written and edited by Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan, with AI research assistance; every figure is meant to trace to the primary source cited. See the Editorial Policy for how sourcing, AI use and corrections work.

Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Contact Us
Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Investment Promotion & Energy-Sector Leader · Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
LinkedIn → GitHub → Email +91 78273 81696
How this site works

Data-led analysis of India's trade, currency and industrial policy. Every article is built from primary official sources, and every figure links back to the release, table or filing it came from.

Sources. DGCI&S TradeStat (imports/exports, HSN-wise) · PIB (government press releases, January 2017 to today, refreshed daily) · RBI (circulars, balance of payments) · MoSPI (CPI/WPI, IIP) · PARIVESH (environmental clearances) · CCIL (bond yields) · BIS (policy rates) · SEBI, NSE/BSE and SEC filings for company data.

Interpretation. Figures carry their vintage and retrieval date; estimates and press-reported numbers are labelled as such; where sources disagree, both are shown. Corrections are made visibly, never silently. Articles are written with AI assistance from the cited sources — AI-generated text can misstate figures even when working from real material, so verify any number that matters to a decision against the linked primary source.

footer

Browse all articles by topic

Every piece on this blog, grouped. Or read the full index.

Agriculture & FertilisersAI ToolsChemicalsClimate & CarbonEnergy & FuelsGas & LNGImport SubstitutionIndustrial PolicyMarkets & FinanceMobility & EVPrices & InflationTextilesTrade & Tariffs

Each topic is a live archive page that updates itself as pieces are labelled. It replaces a hand-kept list that had fallen 18 articles behind.